|
St. Anthony Mary Zaccaria [by Cristina Bellazzi] |
|||
|
|
Without a doubt, the primary source of Anthony Marys spirituality is the Bible. This biblical primacy finds confirmation in the chapter "On Studies" of the Constitutions: "They shall study Sacred Scripture and relish it so avidly as to come to understand it fully, thus reaching its hidden senses, especially those which provide moral edification" (Constitutions 8). Obviously, Anthony Marys approach is far different from that of his contemporary Secular Humanists and Protestant Reformers. Instead, it is the traditional monastic approach of Lectio Divina. Recent scholarship has established that, counting outright quotations, in Latin and Italian, paraphrases, allusions, and, possibly, parallels, Anthony Marys biblical references in his limited amount of extant writings exceed 1700. Among these, over 800 belong to the Pauline Corpus. Unquestionably, Paul is the foremost source of Anthony Marys spirituality. The Apostle was his constant point of reference. For him Paul was not only a saint to be prayed to, but also and above all, a model to be imitated, a role model of personal holiness and active apostolate. Anthony Mary closely adhered to Pauls doctrine, both to its content and verbal expression. It has been said that "Anthony Marys language reflects Pauls much more than the Gospels." Question: How did Anthony Mary become such an ardent disciple of Paul the Apostle? The traditional explanation pointed to his membership in Milans Oratory of Eternal Wisdom. True, this oratory was influenced by French Evangelism, a reform movement which emphasized Pauls role in Christian doctrine and life. It will be recalled that the center of French Evangelism was the Circle of Meaux, founded in 1521 by Bishop Guillaume Briçonnet, Jr., son of Cardinal Guillaume Briçonnet, Sr. Ten years earlier, the Cardinal and his two sons, Bishop Denis and Bishop Guillaume, were in Milan and did participate in the meetings of the Oratory of Eternal Wisdom. However, there is no documentary proof of any direct connection between Anthony Mary and the Circle of Meaux. As a matter of fact, Anthony Mary moved to Milan only in 1531. In addition, nothing in his writings betrays a dependence on Christian Humanistic circles of the time. The sources of Anthony Marys Paulinism must be searched elsewhere. Actually, we do have two clear statements that are very much to the point.
Most probably, they felt the need to shield Anthony Mary from any suspicion of Semi-Pelagianism. That suspicion cast a dark shadow over Fra Battista and, reflectively, on the "Sons of Paul," the early Barnabites. In any case, despite a few passages in his writings that are more or less open to the charge of Semi-Pelagianism, the monk and ascetic Cassian was a most influential figure for entire generations of monks. Just to mention a few prominent people, he influenced St. Benedict, St. Thomas Aquinas, the writers of Devotio Moderna, and St. Ignatius Loyola. Through him, the Wisdom of the Desert Fathers was preserved for all times. Cassian was defined as "a disciple in the East and a master in the West." To our great joy, Cassian is a markedly Pauline author. No wonder: one of his teachers was St. John Chrysostom, the author of over 200 homilies on Pauls letters. It is noteworthy that Chrysostoms 32 homilies on Romans are by far the most remarkable patristic commentary on this letter and the finest of all his works. We may now attempt to delineate the pedigree of Anthony Marys spirituality:
Rather than being a product of his own Humanistic time, Anthony Mary belongs by right to the whole Catholic tradition. He did not represent a break in the Church, but continuity. He was a reformer within the Church tradition; not a revolutionary. Humanists and Protestant Reformers claimed "to return to the origins," but instead they created a discontinuity in Church Tradition and subverted its very nature. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [Content] | [Back] | [Home] | [Next] | [Top] |
| [Charism] | [Mission] | [History] | [Today] | [Links] |